|
TESCO PLANNING APPEAL
Regrettably Tesco won their appeal to unload
Lorries in the main Charminster Rd.
Our representatives attending the appeal report
that unloading must be between the hours of 6am - 8am, and
6pm -8pm. The Forum request that residents be vigilant and
report breaches of non compliance of Tesco if and when they
occur as there is concern about the traffic congestion that
the Lorries will produce.
It was suggested at the appeal that the Lorries
be restricted as to their size and tonnage; to date-no time
has been set for that consultation to take place.
Also at Charminster Rd, C.C.T.V. cameras are
to be installed.
PLANNING NEWS
It is worth noting that perhaps economic forces
will have considerable impact regarding the development
of inappropriate flats in the ward, however currently, planning
has been rejected for 2 small houses on amenity ground at
134/134A Richmond Park Rd.
TRANSPORT - BUS ROUTES - DISABLED CAR
SHARE SCHEME
There is considerable concern regarding the
withdrawal of bus routes and evening/weekend services effectively
imposing a curfew on bus users.
The Forum recognises that this current practice
is in conflict with green policies and the importance
of Richmond Park Rd being a major strategic transport
link with other destinations.
The Forum seeks to work with the appropriate
agencies in order that a resolution is sought as it effects
so many vulnerable residents. It may be of assistance to
inform the public that there is a B.A.T. bus
(Bournemouth Accessible Transport) operating services for
disabled users between Castlepoint Sovereign Centre and
Bournemouth Hospital.
There is also a SOCIAL CAR SHARE SCHEME whereby
users living at BH1 to BH11 post codes can ask for a car
to convey them at a reduced fare.
In order to access the scheme, users must
register ; the annual fee is £4 - £6.
For more information on this service contact
Alison Morrison on 01202 399700. It is a wonderful service
but not nearly advertised enough.
PROBLEM PATH
The footpath which joins Lowther and Milton
Roads has been the subject of ongoing anti-social behavior
and drug usage.
Nearby residents are seeking a solution to
the problem and it has been proposed that public consultation
be sought with a view to either closing the footpath or
gating it.
Other suggestions include better lighting
and maintenance of shrubbery. Community Police Officer Mike
Lowther has organised new shifts for the police to patrol
the footpath in the evenings in an attempt to restrict the
anti social activities reported.
It is a recognised fact that anti-social behaviour
is a symptom of greater problems linked with the night time
economy, houses of multiple occupation, drinking and drug
usage.
The public are the eyes and ears of
the community, crime impacts upon us all. We can assist
by informing our local COMMUNITY POLICE SUPPORT TEAM ON:
01202 222222.
|
Local Improvement Fund
The L.I.F. is a pot of cash allocated by
ward councillors allowing local improvements in the ward:
This could be new public facilities or enhancing old ones.
To allocate cash for projects requires the
signatures of TWO councillors. This presents a problem
when the area is covered by three councillors and two belong
to the same party.
In the interest of encouraging the majority
to liaise and work with the minority, the Forum thought
it more democratic (and less divisive), if ALL THREE COUNCILLORS
had to agree and sign for the fund..
This would make for a fairer system and encourage
councillors to work together and consult their constituents
more fully.
Opposition guidelines
The Forum is not against plans in their entirety,
but does take an exception to developments which are substandard,
inappropriate and unsustainable. We would like to remind
residents that (when opposing plans), you must have ten
separate letters of objection in order to
ensure that the proposed development has to go to the Planning
Board for consideration.
The Board can be attended by those opposing
the plans and request to speak.
Petitions count as only one letter of objection.
Standard printed duplicate letters (for your
neighbours to address and sign) count but carry less weight.
It is advisable to have three differently
worded versions.
There are specific aspects of inappropriate
design which can be cited as good reason as to why you feel
a plan should be refused.
There are advisors at the Forum who can explain
these.
|